Pharma manufacturing · 3 months
Resetting a stalled QA scientist's career in 90 days
Individual client · QA scientist, 7 years' experience
A QA scientist with seven years of experience had been applying for 14 months with no interviews. We rebuilt the positioning, narrowed targets, and ran a 90-day execution sprint. She accepted an offer in week eleven with a 34% comp lift.
The problem
- CV led with responsibilities, not the audits she had personally cleared.
- Applications were scattered across 60+ companies with no fit logic.
- Recruiter calls kept stalling at the 'why are you leaving?' question.
The approach
- Rewrote the CV around four named regulatory audits she had owned end-to-end.
- Cut the target list from 60+ employers to 18 ranked by site location and product class.
- Scripted and rehearsed the transition narrative until it sounded like a decision, not a complaint.
- Weekly check-ins to keep momentum and to debrief every recruiter conversation.
The results
14 months → 11 weeks
Time to offer
0% → 38%
Interview conversion
+34%
Compensation lift
18 (from 60+)
Targets shortlisted
She moved from zero interviews in fourteen months to four offers in the same quarter, and accepted a senior QA role at a mid-size formulation company with a 34% comp lift over her previous package.
Lessons learned
- Most stalled job hunts are positioning problems, not skill problems.
- Narrowing the target list almost always increases volume of interviews, not the opposite.
- The 'why are you leaving?' answer is the single highest-leverage rehearsal in mid-career hiring.
Want a similar engagement? See the services or book a 25-minute call.